The Call Volume Paradox
Joe is a sales professional with a problem. His management is unhappy despite the fact that Joe is fantastically successful at closing great deals.
What could be going wrong? Is Joe breaking the law or company policy? Is he making promises that the organization can’t keep?
Nope. Like many of his colleagues, Joe is in “inside sales,” which means he spends his days “dialing and smiling” to reach out to potential customers. The number one metric in his office is call volume: the total number of outbound calls each sales rep makes in a given day.
However, Joe has made an incredible discovery about the experience of direct sales. When he places an unsolicited phone call to a potential customer, he is intentionally interrupting their workflow. Even if that prospect is interested in Joe’s product, they have to stop whatever they are doing to take the call.
As a result, Joe has started to change his tactics. Instead of going for the sale immediately, he asks for an appointment to make another call later in the next week. “Do you have time Thursday at 3PM to discuss this opportunity? Put it on your calendar and I’ll ring you then.”
The problem strikes on Thursday morning. If Joe’s overall call volume is low, he knows he will get in trouble with management. It doesn’t matter that he has an appointment with a hot lead. So he has to decide: risk a low call volume and keep the appointment, or call the prospect to reschedule and increase his chances of making the daily target?
No stakeholder should ever need to make such a decision. Yet people like Joe do so every day. Organizations need to empower their workers to be able to speak up about systems that don’t make sense. Employees ought to be able to share their discoveries and ideas freely.
You may feel like you are in Joe’s position in your company. Or, you may wonder if your policies and procedures are limiting your success. Find out more through Slaughter Development’s Workplace Diagnostics. We can help find your paradoxes and help you to make lasting, permanent, meaningful change.
❖ ❖ ❖
Like this post? Here are some related entries from The Methodology Blog you might enjoy: