Search

Blog Entries:

Some posts from The Methodology Blog around the time of A Juror's Burden

Archives by Subject:

More Resources

A Juror’s Burden

Monday, April 26, 2010 by Slaughter Development

In the United States’ judicial system, you are considered innocent until proven guilty. And though hefty laws exist to protect this right, is it possible that bad processes and desperate measures get in the way of a fair trial?

In the article Jury Duty Economics: The High Cost of Justice, journalist Barry Watson divulges his experience—and perspective—on jury duty and its economic strain it has on those summoned. He reports that juror concerns boil down to two things: missing valuable work time and losing crucial income.

It isn’t hard to figure out why people try to avoid empanelment: Apart from the lost work time, there’s often a major pay cut. In New York, jury members make $40 per day. Granted, this is significantly more than most states pay—California, for example, only kicks in $15 per day, along with 37 cents per mile for commuters—but $40 per day doesn’t even cover the cost of rent in New York City.

One further aspect of jury duty concerned Watson:

By the time we got to the jury room to decide the case, it seemed like most of us had an eye on the meter . . .

Within a few hours, we came to a decision. It’s hard to determine if the economy affected our final verdict, but I wonder what the rejected jurors might have contributed to the discussion . . . The question is, ultimately, whether the ability to serve on a jury and render judgment against one’s fellow man is becoming a luxury, reserved for those who can afford it.

As a juror, the duty of deciding one’s fate is of extreme importance, not just to the defendant, but to the government as well. However, as Watson pointed out, such a process comes at a cost to those involuntarily losing time and income. Despite this underlying message, the truth is that stakeholders matter. In any process, vital contribution for its success is created, performed and seen by the people conducting the work. The results suffer when these people do not receive the respect they deserve.

At times, it seems that allowing a bottom line to dictate compensation is the only choice of action. This is not always the case. At Slaughter Development, we assist companies in expediting processes so that valuable time and money can be utilized elsewhere. If your company is interested in learning more about how we can help, sign-up for one of our complimentary Productivity Short Talks. We’ll help your process seem less like jury duty and more like swift justice.

❖ ❖ ❖

Like this post? Here are some related entries from The Methodology Blog you might enjoy:

Justice in Jamaica - When Horace Harding pled guilty to a serious traffic offense, he accepted his fate and served a 30-day sentence in prison. Unfortunately, the system designed to record his compliance with the sentence took several weeks to catch up. Harding was then picked up by the police, and because of the processing delay, could not prove he had already cleared the warrant. The slow pace of bureacracy sent Horace Harding to jail twice for only one crime. Read on »
Want to learn more? Register now for the 2011 Productivity Series

Leave a Reply

Switch to our mobile site