Search

Blog Entries:

Some posts from The Methodology Blog around the time of Process Improvement Failure

Archives by Subject:

More Resources

Process Improvement Failure

Wednesday, January 27, 2010 by Slaughter Development

Millions of companies have pursued major business process improvement projects. Some new evidence reported in the Wall Street Journal, however, shows that most of these endeavors fail.

According to Satya Chakravorty, this phenomenon should be no surprise:

What do weight-loss plans and process-improvement programs such as Six Sigma and “lean manufacturing” have in common?

They typically start off well, generating excitement and great progress, but all too often fail to have a lasting impact as participants gradually lose motivation and fall back into old habits.

Chakravorty correctly identifies one of the  two broad reasons why most process improvement programs fail: change is hard. To implement new systems and maintain new patterns requires incredible diligence, and we are more likely than not to return to our previous ways.

However, there is a second, more fundamental reason why Six Sigma, Lean Manufacturing and many other approaches are unsuccessful: forcing others to change is nearly impossible. Note the tone of some other parts of the article:

Team members collected data on their current working environment and, with the help of the Six Sigma expert, identified the changes they most needed to make to achieve their stated goal… the expert developed a “to do” list that included action items, responsibilities and deadlines and made sure needed resources were available.

With the departure of the Six Sigma expert, the teams…lost their objective voice…Without the expert to rein them in, some team members began pushing agendas that benefited themselves and their departments, making it harder for the team to agree on new goals.

Read those words carefully. The expert creates the “to do” list, not the stakeholders. The expert is the person who has to “rein in” the team, because only the expert is capable of being “objective.” This is a process improvement model based on telling people what to do, not helping them to develop new practices on their own or trusting them to be responsible.

The Methodology Blog reports on Six Sigma failures routinely. We combat these challenges with methodology engineering by listening first, empowering stakeholders through training, and staying engaged with our clients for at least twelve months to help ensure that new habits become permanent. Improve your organization. Contact Slaughter Development today!

❖ ❖ ❖

Like this post? Here are some related entries from The Methodology Blog you might enjoy:

Summit: Continuous Improvement Primer - The final session at the Indianapolis Productivity Summit last Monday was an overview of popular approaches for “continuous improvement.” Read on »
Process Management Is Wrong For You - Continuous improvement programs like Six Sigma insist that processes must be managed. Although this might seem reasonable, it is stakeholders— not managers—who should design and maintain regular routines. Read on »
Taking on Lean Six Sigma - People often ask us if we use popular change management techniques like Lean Manufacturing or Six Sigma. The answer is definitely no, but not for the reasons you might think. Read on »
Want to learn more? Register now for the 2012 Productivity Series

Leave a Reply

Switch to our mobile site