Search

Blog Entries:

Some posts from The Methodology Blog around the time of From Threat to Request

Archives by Subject:

More Resources

From Threat to Request

Tuesday, January 12, 2010 by Slaughter Development

In yesterday’s edition of The Methodology Blog, we reviewed a poorly-worded email message from management. Today, we will show how to rewrite that same text so that it fosters satisfaction and productivity.

The post on employee communication included the following snippet forwarded to Slaughter Development anonymously:

Please look at the attached list and make sure you know what day and time you are scheduled for the [REDACTED] Training. This training will be two hours so please plan the rest of your day accordingly.

Please remember, this is a MANDATORY training.  As was stated in a previous email re: [REDACTED] Training, “staff members are going to be held accountable for not attending meetings, or arriving late.  This will include corrective action plans, written reprimands and if not corrected could result in termination.”

In order to change the tone of this notice, we must do more than just swap out a few words. Instead, we have to change our perspective on the purpose of this message.

At its core, the email is really just providing information. But that data comes in two varieties: facts and expectations. The first is simply the training schedule and notice that the training lasts two hours. The latter, however, indicates what the author believes about the people who are reading the message. If we simply strip the expectations, the email becomes much cleaner:

Please look at the attached list to see the day and time you are scheduled for the [REDACTED] Training. Please note that the training will be two hours in length. Thank you!

Of course, we cannot remove expectations entirely. The structure of all work is based upon expectations, which consist of both responsibility and authority. The use (and capitalization) of the word MANDATORY implies that all of the authority in this case lies with management. Language such as “held accountable”, “written reprimands” and “could result in termination” show that the employees have responsibility for their fate.

Instead, consider a more balanced approach to the second paragraph:

We believe you will find this training to be tremendously beneficial. If you are not able to make your scheduled time due to other commitments, reply to this message so we can take a look at your workload.

Changing the phrasing as shown above uses empowering, supportive language. It reminds employees that trainings are intended as a benefit, not a burden. Still, it clearly states that employees are expected to attend the training, but also gives them another option: talking to their manager.

At Slaughter Development, we constantly work with our clients to help them improve productivity, workflow and stakeholder satisfaction.  Making improvements to the words we use at the office can tremendously impact success. Learn more about how to write and speak more effectively. Contact Slaughter Development today!

❖ ❖ ❖

Like this post? Here are some related entries from The Methodology Blog you might enjoy:

A Forwarded Threat - Companies use email to communicate on just about every imaginable topic, from party announcements to corporate decisions. But it’s still surprising to see an email that contains an underlying use of threatening language. Read on »
The Causes of Overwork, Part 1 - If you’re working too hard, putting in too many hours and not getting enough sleep, there is certainly a culprit. In fact, overwork is caused by at least one of exactly three reasons.
Read on »
What It Means To Be Productive - There’s an old adage that suggests “the cobbler’s children have no shoes.” As a productivity expert however, I don’t think this saying is acceptable. I make it a point to get a tremendous amount of work accomplished in a given day.
Read on »
Want to learn more? Register now for the 2011 Productivity Series

Leave a Reply

Switch to our mobile site